Model vs model

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Hy3

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 costs barely more than Hy3, $0.26 against $0.25 per 1M tokens blended, and its lead justifies that: an Intelligence Index of 45.1 against 25.3, with higher scores on all four shared benchmarks. It also accepts images and offers a 1.05M-token context window, versus 262K for Hy3. Hy3 fits only workloads where that slight price edge decides the choice.

Free to try, no account needed. You see each answer’s cost and speed.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number.

Blended price · per 1M tokens, lower is better

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017$0.26
Hy3$0.25

Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis, higher is better

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101745.1
Hy325.3

Context window · tokens it can read at once

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 10171.05M
Hy3262K

Where they sit among all 44 models

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ranks 10th of the 43 models with an Intelligence Index, Hy3 28th. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017.

Intelligence: the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Price: blended per 1M tokens, 3 parts input to 1 part output, on a log scale.

Which one to pick

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if

  • you want the higher overall score (45.1 vs 25.3)
  • you care about Terminal-Bench 4.0 (terminal tasks): 33.8 vs 0.5
  • you care about Humanity's Last Exam (hard reasoning): 43.3 vs 33.5
  • you need a longer context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens)

Pick Hy3 if

  • you want the lower bill ($0.25 vs $0.26 per 1M tokens blended)

See how they answer your prompt

How smart is each one?

Of the 10 scores both models have, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is ahead on every one.

Every intelligence score we have

Out of 100, higher is better. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Hy3

Overall

  • Intelligence Index

By area

  • Coding

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: not scored yet

  • Agentic work

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: not scored yet

By field of work

  • Finance & accounting

  • Legal

  • Healthcare & medicine

    Hy3: not scored yet

  • Economics

  • Engineering

  • Strategy & operations

Benchmarks

  • Factual knowledge · SimpleQA

    Hy3: not scored yet

  • Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam

  • Science · GPQA Diamond

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: not scored yet

  • Scientific coding · SciCode

  • Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0

  • Tool use · τ-Bench Banking

    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: not scored yet

  • Long documents · AA-LCR

Test them on your own question

The specs

Spec DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Hy3
Input price$0.15 per 1M$0.14 per 1M
Output price$0.60 per 1M$0.58 per 1M
Cost per test task$0.2620Not tested
Context window1.05M262K
Max output393K262K
AcceptsText, ImageText
Open weightsYesYes
LabDeepSeekTencent
ReleasedOct 2026Jul 2026
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025Not published

Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev. Cost per test task from Artificial Analysis.

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Hy3 cheaper?

Hy3 is cheaper. It charges $0.14 per 1M input tokens and $0.58 per 1M output tokens, against $0.15 and $0.60 for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017. Blended 3 parts input to 1 part output, that is $0.25 against $0.26 per 1M tokens.

Which is smarter, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Hy3?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 45.1 against 25.3 for Hy3. The biggest differences are on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (33.8 vs 0.5) and Humanity's Last Exam (43.3 vs 33.5).

Which has the longer context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts 1.05M tokens, against 262K for Hy3.

Can I compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Hy3 on my own prompt?

Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and read the answers side by side, with what each one cost. Compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Hy3 →

Where the numbers come from

Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except SimpleQA, which is from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated October 25, 2026.