Model vs model
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (55.1 vs 22.2), but costs 4.7× as much: $4 per 1M tokens blended against $0.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for high-volume work where cost matters, and Kimi K3.1 Pro when quality matters most. The biggest gap is on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (terminal tasks), where Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 67.2 against 1 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
At a glance
Longer bar means the bigger number.
Blended price · per 1M tokens, lower is better
Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis, higher is better
Where they sit among all 31 models
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ranks 27th of the 30 models with an Intelligence Index, Kimi K3.1 Pro 3rd. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
Which one to pick
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if
- you want the lower bill ($0.85 vs $4 per 1M tokens blended)
- you need to send video, audio and PDFs
Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro if
- you want the higher overall score (55.1 vs 22.2)
- you care about Terminal-Bench 4.0 (terminal tasks): 67.2 vs 1
- you care about Humanity's Last Exam (hard reasoning): 52.5 vs 18.8
- you want open weights you can run yourself
How smart is each one?
Of the 10 scores both models have, Kimi K3.1 Pro is ahead on every one.
Every intelligence score we have
Out of 100, higher is better. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Kimi K3.1 Pro
Overall
Intelligence Index
22.255.1
By area
Coding
49.3Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
Agentic work
14.3Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
By field of work
Finance & accounting
23.556.5Legal
30.355.8Healthcare & medicine
23.6Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
Economics
31.460Engineering
24.455.9Strategy & operations
22.459.4
Benchmarks
Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam
18.852.5Science · GPQA Diamond
83.8Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
Scientific coding · SciCode
41.360.8Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0
167.2Tool use · τ-Bench Banking
17.5Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
Long documents · AA-LCR
76 · 86.3
Our tests
Rule that has to last 4 turns · our test, % of tries passed
100Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
Three bullets, no letter e · our test, % of tries passed
33Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet
The specs
| Spec | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.30 per 1M | $2 per 1M |
| Output price | $2.50 per 1M | $10 per 1M |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 66K | 1.05M |
| Accepts | Text, Image, Video, Audio, PDF | Text, Image |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Lab | Kimi | |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2026 | Not published |
Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev.
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3.1 Pro cheaper?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is cheaper. It charges $0.30 per 1M input tokens and $2.50 per 1M output tokens, against $2 and $10 for Kimi K3.1 Pro. Blended 3 parts input to 1 part output, that is $0.85 against $4 per 1M tokens.
Which is smarter, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 55.1 against 22.2 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. The biggest differences are on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (1 vs 67.2) and Humanity's Last Exam (18.8 vs 52.5).
Which has the longer context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
Can I compare Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Kimi K3.1 Pro on my own prompt?
Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.
Related comparisons
Where the numbers come from
Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except SimpleQA, which is from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated October 23, 2026.