Model vs model
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B for cost-sensitive text and image work, especially long documents, where it scores 83.3 on AA-LCR against 76 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and costs $0.64 per 1M tokens blended. Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite for multimodal jobs needing video, audio or PDFs, or for higher overall quality, since its Intelligence Index is 22.2 against 17.5, though it costs $0.85 per 1M tokens blended.
At a glance
Longer bar means the bigger number.
Blended price · per 1M tokens, lower is better
Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis, higher is better
Context window · tokens it can read at once
Where they sit among all 44 models
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ranks 31st of the 43 models with an Intelligence Index, Muse Glimmer 30B 33rd. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
Which one to pick
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if
- you want the higher overall score (22.2 vs 17.5)
- you care about agentic work: 14.3 vs 8.5
- you need a longer context window (1.05M vs 131K tokens)
- you need to send video, audio and PDFs
Pick Muse Glimmer 30B if
- you want the lower bill ($0.64 vs $0.85 per 1M tokens blended)
- you care about AA-LCR (long documents): 83.3 vs 76
- you care about τ-Bench Banking (tool use): 23.5 vs 17.5
- you want open weights you can run yourself
How smart is each one?
Of the 14 scores both models have, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is ahead on 7 and Muse Glimmer 30B on 4, and 3 are within a point.
Every intelligence score we have
Out of 100, higher is better. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Muse Glimmer 30B
Overall
Intelligence Index
22.217.5
By area
Coding
49.3 · 49Agentic work
14.38.5
By field of work
Finance & accounting
23.517.5Legal
30.318.3Healthcare & medicine
23.6Muse Glimmer 30B: not scored yet
Economics
31.425Engineering
24.419.9Strategy & operations
22.414.5
Benchmarks
Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam
18.822Science · GPQA Diamond
83.8 · 83.5Scientific coding · SciCode
41.344.9Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0
1 · 0.5Tool use · τ-Bench Banking
17.523.5Long documents · AA-LCR
7683.3Uncensored · UGI
44.1Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: not scored yet
Our tests
Rule that has to last 4 turns · our test, % of tries passed
100Muse Glimmer 30B: not scored yet
Three bullets, no letter e · our test, % of tries passed
33Muse Glimmer 30B: not scored yet
The specs
| Spec | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.30 per 1M | $0.35 per 1M |
| Output price | $2.50 per 1M | $1.50 per 1M |
| Cost per test task | $0.1927 | Not tested |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Accepts | Text, Image, Video, Audio, PDF | Text, Image |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Lab | Meta | |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2026 | Jan 2026 |
Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev. Cost per test task from Artificial Analysis.
Questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Muse Glimmer 30B cheaper?
Muse Glimmer 30B is cheaper. It charges $0.35 per 1M input tokens and $1.50 per 1M output tokens, against $0.30 and $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite. Blended 3 parts input to 1 part output, that is $0.64 against $0.85 per 1M tokens.
Which is smarter, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.2 against 17.5 for Muse Glimmer 30B. The biggest differences are on AA-LCR (76 vs 83.3) and τ-Bench Banking (17.5 vs 23.5).
Which has the longer context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts 1.05M tokens, against 131K for Muse Glimmer 30B.
Can I compare Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Muse Glimmer 30B on my own prompt?
Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.
Related comparisons
Where the numbers come from
Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except SimpleQA, which is from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated October 25, 2026.