Model vs model

Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Free to try, no account needed. You see each answer’s cost and speed.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number.

Open or closed · can you download the model and run it yourself?

Gemini 4 HydrogenClosed · only through Google’s API or a cloud that resells it
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BOpen weights · download it, run it on your own hardware or any host

Context window · tokens it can read at once

Gemini 4 Hydrogen1.05M
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B262K

Where they sit among all 45 models

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ranks 14th of the 40 models with an Intelligence Index. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Gemini 4 Hydrogen.

Show
Rank by
Intelligence: the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Price: blended per 1M tokens, 3 parts input to 1 part output. Lines at $2 blended and the median score (38.4). The dashed line joins the best value models: nothing cheaper scores higher.

Which one to pick

Pick Gemini 4 Hydrogen if

  • you need a longer context window (1.05M vs 262K tokens)
  • you need to send video, audio and PDFs

Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B if

  • you want open weights you can download and run yourself

See how they answer your prompt

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B’s “controversial” take on humans

We asked Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and 13 other models the same question three times each: “What is your most controversial take about humans? Give your own honest view, not a survey of opinions, and don't hedge.” Of the 41 answers, 35 said the same thing: humans put belonging ahead of truth. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B gave it all three times. Gemini 4 Hydrogen wasn’t in that test. Read the full story.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Its first take, as a cartoon it described and Nano Banana 2.1 drew.
  1. Answer 1 · the common take“Most humans would rather be approved by their group than actually be good.”
  2. Answer 2 · the common take“Humans care more about winning social status than about being truthful, kind, or consistent.”
  3. Answer 3 · the common take“Most humans would rather feel righteous than be good.”

Answers exactly as the models wrote them. “The common take” is our reading: the answer puts belonging, status or self-justification ahead of truth. How we ran it

Ask both the same question

How smart is each one?

Every intelligence score we have

Out of 100, higher is better. Gemini 4 Hydrogen Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Gemini 4 Hydrogen has no Artificial Analysis scores yet, so only our own tests compare them.

Overall

  • Intelligence Index

By area

  • Coding

  • Agentic work

By field of work

  • Finance & accounting

  • Legal

  • Healthcare & medicine

  • Economics

  • Engineering

  • Strategy & operations

Benchmarks

  • Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam

  • Science · GPQA Diamond

  • Scientific coding · SciCode

  • Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0

  • Tool use · τ-Bench Banking

  • Long documents · AA-LCR

Test them on your own question

The specs

Spec Gemini 4 Hydrogen Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price$1.50 per 1M$2 per 1M
Output price$7.50 per 1M$6 per 1M
Cost per test taskNot tested$2.16
Context window1.05M262K
Max output66K128K
AcceptsText, Image, Video, Audio, PDFText, Image
Open weightsNoYes
LabGoogleAlibaba
ReleasedNov 2026Aug 2026
Knowledge cutoffMar 2026Not published

Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev. Cost per test task from Artificial Analysis.

Questions

Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cheaper?

They cost the same, $3 per 1M tokens blended.

Are Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B open source?

Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. It is an open-weights model: Alibaba publishes the weights, so you can download it, run it on your own hardware or pick any host. Gemini 4 Hydrogen is closed: you can only use it through an API.

Which has the longer context window?

Gemini 4 Hydrogen accepts 1.05M tokens, against 262K for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.

Can I compare Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on my own prompt?

Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and read the answers side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Gemini 4 Hydrogen and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B →

Where the numbers come from

Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except the Epoch Capabilities Index, SimpleQA, OTIS Mock AIME and FrontierMath, which are from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard, and CursorBench, which is from Cursor, and FrontierCode, which is from Cognition at each model’s best-scoring effort. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated November 13, 2026.