Model vs model

GPT OSS 120B vs Muse Ember

Free to try, no account needed. You see each answer’s cost and speed.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number.

Open or closed · can you download the model and run it yourself?

GPT OSS 120BOpen weights · download it, run it on your own hardware or any host
Muse EmberClosed · only through Meta’s API or a cloud that resells it

Context window · tokens it can read at once

GPT OSS 120B131K
Muse Ember1.05M

Where they sit among all 45 models

GPT OSS 120B ranks 36th of the 40 models with an Intelligence Index. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with GPT OSS 120B.

Show
Rank by
Intelligence: the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Price: blended per 1M tokens, 3 parts input to 1 part output. Lines at $2 blended and the median score (38.4). The dashed line joins the best value models: nothing cheaper scores higher.

Which one to pick

Pick GPT OSS 120B if

  • you want open weights you can download and run yourself

Pick Muse Ember if

  • you need a longer context window (1.05M vs 131K tokens)
  • you need to send images and PDFs

See how they answer your prompt

How smart is each one?

Every intelligence score we have

Out of 100, higher is better. GPT OSS 120B Muse Ember

Muse Ember has no Artificial Analysis scores yet, so only our own tests compare them.

Overall

  • Intelligence Index

By area

  • Coding

  • Math

  • Agentic work

By field of work

  • Finance & accounting

  • Legal

  • Healthcare & medicine

  • Economics

  • Engineering

  • Strategy & operations

Benchmarks

  • Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam

  • Science · GPQA Diamond

  • Competition math · OTIS Mock AIME

  • Knowledge · MMLU-Pro

  • Competitive coding · LiveCodeBench

  • Scientific coding · SciCode

  • Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0

  • Tool use · τ-Bench Banking

  • Instruction following · IFBench

  • Long documents · AA-LCR

  • Competition math · AIME 2025

  • Uncensored · UGI

Test them on your own question

The specs

Spec GPT OSS 120B Muse Ember
Input price$0.10 per 1M$0.10 per 1M
Output price$0.50 per 1M$0.50 per 1M
Cost per test task$0.1076Not tested
Context window131K1.05M
Max output131K—
AcceptsTextText, Image, PDF
Open weightsYesNo
LabOpenAIMeta
ReleasedAug 2025Nov 2026
Knowledge cutoffJun 2024Not published

Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev. Cost per test task from Artificial Analysis.

Questions

Is GPT OSS 120B or Muse Ember cheaper?

They cost the same, $0.20 per 1M tokens blended.

Are GPT OSS 120B and Muse Ember open source?

Only GPT OSS 120B. It is an open-weights model: OpenAI publishes the weights, so you can download it, run it on your own hardware or pick any host. Muse Ember is closed: you can only use it through an API.

Which has the longer context window?

Muse Ember accepts 1.05M tokens, against 131K for GPT OSS 120B.

Can I compare GPT OSS 120B and Muse Ember on my own prompt?

Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and read the answers side by side, with what each one cost. Compare GPT OSS 120B and Muse Ember →

Where the numbers come from

Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except the Epoch Capabilities Index, SimpleQA, OTIS Mock AIME and FrontierMath, which are from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard, and CursorBench, which is from Cursor, and FrontierCode, which is from Cognition at each model’s best-scoring effort. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated November 13, 2026.