Image model vs image model

Fibo 2.0 vs FLUX.2 Dev

People picked Fibo 2.0’s picture over FLUX.2 Dev’s about 56% of the time in blind votes. FLUX.2 Dev costs 3.3× less ($0.04 against $0.012 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.

$0.04 and $0.012 a picture, paid from your credits. New accounts start with free credit.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.

Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture

Fibo 2.0 FLUX.2 Dev

Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better

Fibo 2.0$0.04
FLUX.2 Dev$0.012

Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better

Fibo 2.01039
FLUX.2 Dev1000

Editing · arena Elo, higher is better

Fibo 2.01088
FLUX.2 Dev1000

Where they sit among all 56 image models

Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Fibo 2.0. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.

Quality: Elo from the Artificial Analysis text-to-image arena. Price: one 1024×1024 image, on a log scale. The dashed line joins the best picture you can get at each price.

Which one to pick

Pick Fibo 2.0 if

  • you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over FLUX.2 Dev’s about 56% of the time
  • you mostly edit pictures: it scores higher in the editing arena (Elo 1088 against 1000)

Pick FLUX.2 Dev if

  • price matters: 100 images cost $1.20, against $4.00 with Fibo 2.0

See what both make of your prompt

The specs

Spec Fibo 2.0 FLUX.2 Dev
Price per image$0.04$0.012 ($0.024 per edit)
100 images$4.00$1.20
Text-to-image Elo1039 ±12 (#23 in the arena)1000 (#46 in the arena)
Editing Elo1088 ±14 (#22 in the arena)1000 (#47 in the arena)
Arena votes5,11318,040
Edits uploaded picturesYesYes
Largest size——
Open weightsYesYes
Zero data retention——
LabBriaBlack Forest Labs
Official nameFibo 2.0FLUX.2 [dev]
ReleasedOctober 2026November 2025

Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from fal.ai.

Questions

Which is better, Fibo 2.0 or FLUX.2 Dev?

People picked Fibo 2.0’s picture over FLUX.2 Dev’s about 56% of the time in blind votes. FLUX.2 Dev costs 3.3× less ($0.04 against $0.012 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.

Which is cheaper, Fibo 2.0 or FLUX.2 Dev?

FLUX.2 Dev: $0.012 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.04 for Fibo 2.0. 100 images cost $1.20 and $4.00.

Can Fibo 2.0 and FLUX.2 Dev edit images?

Yes, both can change a picture you upload. In the Artificial Analysis editing arena Fibo 2.0 has an Elo of 1088 and FLUX.2 Dev 1000.

How can I compare Fibo 2.0 and FLUX.2 Dev myself?

Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and see the pictures side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Fibo 2.0 and FLUX.2 Dev →

Where the numbers come from

Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated October 25, 2026.