Image model vs image model

Fibo 2.0 vs FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

People picked Fibo 2.0’s picture over FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra’s about 74% of the time in blind votes, and it costs 1.5× less: $0.04 against $0.06 an image.

$0.04 and $0.06 a picture, paid from your credits. New accounts start with free credit.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.

Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture

Fibo 2.0 FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra

Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better

Fibo 2.0$0.04
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra$0.06

Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better

Fibo 2.01039
FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra855

Where they sit among all 56 image models

Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Fibo 2.0. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.

Quality: Elo from the Artificial Analysis text-to-image arena. Price: one 1024×1024 image, on a log scale. The dashed line joins the best picture you can get at each price.

Which one to pick

Pick Fibo 2.0 if

  • you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra’s about 74% of the time
  • price matters: 100 images cost $4.00, against $6.00 with FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
  • you need to edit pictures you upload; FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra only makes new ones here
  • you want open weights you can run yourself

See what both make of your prompt

The specs

Spec Fibo 2.0 FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
Price per image$0.04$0.06
100 images$4.00$6.00
Text-to-image Elo1039 ±12 (#23 in the arena)855 ±19 (#93 in the arena)
Editing Elo1088 ±14 (#22 in the arena)Not scored yet
Arena votes5,1132,284
Edits uploaded picturesYesNo
Largest size——
Open weightsYesNo
Zero data retention—No
LabBriaBlack Forest Labs
Official nameFibo 2.0FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra
ReleasedOctober 2026November 2024

Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai.

Questions

Which is better, Fibo 2.0 or FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra?

People picked Fibo 2.0’s picture over FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra’s about 74% of the time in blind votes, and it costs 1.5× less: $0.04 against $0.06 an image.

Which is cheaper, Fibo 2.0 or FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra?

Fibo 2.0: $0.04 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.06 for FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra. 100 images cost $4.00 and $6.00.

Can Fibo 2.0 and FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra edit images?

Fibo 2.0 can change a picture you upload. FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra only makes new pictures from a prompt here.

How can I compare Fibo 2.0 and FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra myself?

Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and see the pictures side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Fibo 2.0 and FLUX1.1 [pro] Ultra →

Where the numbers come from

Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated October 25, 2026.