Image model vs image model
Fibo 2.0 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)
People picked Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)’s picture over Fibo 2.0’s about 64% of the time in blind votes. Fibo 2.0 costs 1.7× less ($0.04 against $0.067 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.
At a glance
Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.
Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture
Fibo 2.0 Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)
Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better
Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better
Editing · arena Elo, higher is better
Where they sit among all 56 image models
Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Fibo 2.0. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.
Which one to pick
Pick Fibo 2.0 if
- price matters: 100 images cost $4.00, against $6.70 with Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)
- you want open weights you can run yourself
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) if
- you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over Fibo 2.0’s about 64% of the time
- you mostly edit pictures: it scores higher in the editing arena (Elo 1123 against 1088)
The specs
| Spec | Fibo 2.0 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) |
|---|---|---|
| Price per image | $0.04 | $0.067 |
| 100 images | $4.00 | $6.70 |
| Text-to-image Elo | 1039 ±12 (#23 in the arena) | 1140 ±10 (#7 in the arena) |
| Editing Elo | 1088 ±14 (#22 in the arena) | 1123 ±12 (#12 in the arena) |
| Arena votes | 5,113 | 16,075 |
| Edits uploaded pictures | Yes | Yes |
| Largest size | — | 4K |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Zero data retention | — | No |
| Lab | Bria | |
| Official name | Fibo 2.0 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) |
| Released | October 2026 | May 2026 |
Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai.
Questions
Which is better, Fibo 2.0 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)?
People picked Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)’s picture over Fibo 2.0’s about 64% of the time in blind votes. Fibo 2.0 costs 1.7× less ($0.04 against $0.067 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.
Which is cheaper, Fibo 2.0 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2)?
Fibo 2.0: $0.04 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.067 for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2). 100 images cost $4.00 and $6.70.
Can Fibo 2.0 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) edit images?
Yes, both can change a picture you upload. In the Artificial Analysis editing arena Fibo 2.0 has an Elo of 1088 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) 1123.
How can I compare Fibo 2.0 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (Nano Banana 2) myself?
Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.
Related comparisons
Where the numbers come from
Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated October 25, 2026.