Image model vs image model

Fibo 2.0 vs MiniMax H3 Image

People picked MiniMax H3 Image’s picture over Fibo 2.0’s about 54% of the time in blind votes, and it costs 1.5× less: $0.04 against ≈$0.027 an image.

$0.04 and ≈$0.027 a picture, paid from your credits. New accounts start with free credit.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.

Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture

Fibo 2.0 MiniMax H3 Image

Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better

Fibo 2.0$0.04
MiniMax H3 Image≈$0.027

Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better

Fibo 2.01038
MiniMax H3 Image1066

Editing · arena Elo, higher is better

Fibo 2.01085
MiniMax H3 Image1138

Where they sit among all 61 image models

Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Fibo 2.0. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.

Quality: Elo from the Artificial Analysis text-to-image arena. Price: one 1024×1024 image, on a log scale. The dashed line joins the best picture you can get at each price.

Which one to pick

Pick MiniMax H3 Image if

  • you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over Fibo 2.0’s about 54% of the time
  • price matters: 100 images cost $2.68, against $4.00 with Fibo 2.0
  • you mostly edit pictures: it scores higher in the editing arena (Elo 1138 against 1085)

See what both make of your prompt

The specs

Spec Fibo 2.0 MiniMax H3 Image
Price per image$0.04≈$0.027 (estimated, high quality)
100 images$4.00$2.68
Text-to-image Elo1038 ±11 (#28 in the arena)1066 ±15 (#23 in the arena)
Editing Elo1085 ±13 (#28 in the arena)1138 ±16 (#12 in the arena)
Edits uploaded picturesYesYes
Largest size——
Open weightsYesYes
Zero data retention—No
LabBriaminimax
Official nameFibo 2.0MiniMax H3 Image
ReleasedOctober 2026November 2026

Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai.

Questions

Which is better, Fibo 2.0 or MiniMax H3 Image?

People picked MiniMax H3 Image’s picture over Fibo 2.0’s about 54% of the time in blind votes, and it costs 1.5× less: $0.04 against ≈$0.027 an image.

Which is cheaper, Fibo 2.0 or MiniMax H3 Image?

MiniMax H3 Image: ≈$0.027 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.04 for Fibo 2.0. 100 images cost $2.68 and $4.00. MiniMax H3 Image is billed per token, so its price is an estimate at high quality.

Can Fibo 2.0 and MiniMax H3 Image edit images?

Yes, both can change a picture you upload. In the Artificial Analysis editing arena Fibo 2.0 has an Elo of 1085 and MiniMax H3 Image 1138.

How can I compare Fibo 2.0 and MiniMax H3 Image myself?

Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and see the pictures side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Fibo 2.0 and MiniMax H3 Image →

Where the numbers come from

Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated November 13, 2026.