Image model vs image model
FLUX.2 Dev Flash vs Muse Image 1.0
People picked Muse Image 1.0’s picture over FLUX.2 Dev Flash’s about 69% of the time in blind votes. FLUX.2 Dev Flash costs 2× less ($0.005 against $0.01 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.
At a glance
Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.
Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture
FLUX.2 Dev Flash Muse Image 1.0
Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better
Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better
Editing · arena Elo, higher is better
Same prompt, both models
We give every image model the same fixed prompts. Here is what FLUX.2 Dev Flash and Muse Image 1.0 made. Each made one picture per prompt; nothing was picked or retouched.
Hands and text
“A fruit seller at a Bangkok night market hands a mango to a smiling child. Above the stall a banner reads AUNTIE NOK'S FRUIT, and a hand-painted price board lists MANGO STICKY RICE 60, FRESH MANGO 40, COCONUT 30, OPEN TILL 2AM. String lights, steam from a noodle stall, 35mm photo”
FLUX.2 Dev Flash
Muse Image 1.0
Where they sit among all 56 image models
Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with FLUX.2 Dev Flash. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.
Which one to pick
Pick FLUX.2 Dev Flash if
- price matters: 100 images cost $0.50, against $1.00 with Muse Image 1.0
- you need to edit pictures you upload; Muse Image 1.0 only makes new ones here
- you want open weights you can run yourself
Pick Muse Image 1.0 if
- you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over FLUX.2 Dev Flash’s about 69% of the time
- your prompts mustn’t be stored: every provider that serves it promises zero data retention
The specs
| Spec | FLUX.2 Dev Flash | Muse Image 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Price per image | $0.005 ($0.01 per edit) | $0.01 |
| 100 images | $0.50 | $1.00 |
| Text-to-image Elo | 988 ±12 (#55 in the arena) | 1127 ±11 (#8 in the arena) |
| Editing Elo | 1012 ±18 (#44 in the arena) | 1129 ±12 (#9 in the arena) |
| Arena votes | 5,344 | 8,479 |
| Edits uploaded pictures | Yes | No |
| Largest size | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| Zero data retention | — | Yes |
| Lab | fal | Meta |
| Official name | FLUX.2 [dev] Flash | Muse Image 1.0 |
| Released | December 2025 | July 2026 |
Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai.
Questions
Which is better, FLUX.2 Dev Flash or Muse Image 1.0?
People picked Muse Image 1.0’s picture over FLUX.2 Dev Flash’s about 69% of the time in blind votes. FLUX.2 Dev Flash costs 2× less ($0.005 against $0.01 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.
Which is cheaper, FLUX.2 Dev Flash or Muse Image 1.0?
FLUX.2 Dev Flash: $0.005 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.01 for Muse Image 1.0. 100 images cost $0.50 and $1.00.
Can FLUX.2 Dev Flash and Muse Image 1.0 edit images?
FLUX.2 Dev Flash can change a picture you upload. Muse Image 1.0 only makes new pictures from a prompt here.
How can I compare FLUX.2 Dev Flash and Muse Image 1.0 myself?
Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.
Related comparisons
Where the numbers come from
Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated October 25, 2026.