Image model vs image model

Muse Image 1.0 vs Qwen-Image

People picked Muse Image 1.0’s picture over Qwen-Image’s about 78% of the time in blind votes, and it costs 2× less: $0.01 against $0.02 an image.

$0.01 and $0.02 a picture, paid from your credits. New accounts start with free credit.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.

Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture

Muse Image 1.0 Qwen-Image

Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better

Muse Image 1.0$0.01
Qwen-Image$0.02

Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better

Muse Image 1.01127
Qwen-Image903

Editing · arena Elo, higher is better

Muse Image 1.01129
Qwen-Image889

Where they sit among all 56 image models

Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Muse Image 1.0. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.

Quality: Elo from the Artificial Analysis text-to-image arena. Price: one 1024×1024 image, on a log scale. The dashed line joins the best picture you can get at each price.

Which one to pick

Pick Muse Image 1.0 if

  • you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over Qwen-Image’s about 78% of the time
  • price matters: 100 images cost $1.00, against $2.00 with Qwen-Image
  • your prompts mustn’t be stored: every provider that serves it promises zero data retention

Pick Qwen-Image if

  • you need to edit pictures you upload; Muse Image 1.0 only makes new ones here
  • you want open weights you can run yourself

See what both make of your prompt

The specs

Spec Muse Image 1.0 Qwen-Image
Price per image$0.01$0.02 ($0.03 per edit)
100 images$1.00$2.00
Text-to-image Elo1127 ±11 (#8 in the arena)903 ±18 (#83 in the arena)
Editing Elo1129 ±12 (#9 in the arena)889 ±20 (#69 in the arena)
Arena votes8,4792,339
Edits uploaded picturesNoYes
Largest size——
Open weightsNoYes
Zero data retentionYes—
LabMetaAlibaba
Official nameMuse Image 1.0Qwen-Image
ReleasedJuly 2026August 2025

Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai.

Questions

Which is better, Muse Image 1.0 or Qwen-Image?

People picked Muse Image 1.0’s picture over Qwen-Image’s about 78% of the time in blind votes, and it costs 2× less: $0.01 against $0.02 an image.

Which is cheaper, Muse Image 1.0 or Qwen-Image?

Muse Image 1.0: $0.01 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.02 for Qwen-Image. 100 images cost $1.00 and $2.00.

Can Muse Image 1.0 and Qwen-Image edit images?

Qwen-Image can change a picture you upload. Muse Image 1.0 only makes new pictures from a prompt here.

How can I compare Muse Image 1.0 and Qwen-Image myself?

Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and see the pictures side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Muse Image 1.0 and Qwen-Image →

Where the numbers come from

Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated October 25, 2026.