Image model vs image model

Qwen-Image vs Seedream 5.0 Lite

People picked Seedream 5.0 Lite’s picture over Qwen-Image’s about 66% of the time in blind votes. Qwen-Image costs 1.8× less ($0.02 against $0.035 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.

$0.02 and $0.035 a picture, paid from your credits. New accounts start with free credit.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number. Elo bars start at 800.

Blind votes · how often people would pick each picture

Qwen-Image Seedream 5.0 Lite

Price per image · 1024×1024, lower is better

Qwen-Image$0.02
Seedream 5.0 Lite$0.035

Text to image · arena Elo, higher is better

Qwen-Image903
Seedream 5.0 Lite1017

Editing · arena Elo, higher is better

Qwen-Image889
Seedream 5.0 Lite1062

Where they sit among all 56 image models

Up and to the left is better pictures for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Qwen-Image. Models the arena hasn’t rated yet sit in the grey lane at the bottom.

Quality: Elo from the Artificial Analysis text-to-image arena. Price: one 1024×1024 image, on a log scale. The dashed line joins the best picture you can get at each price.

Which one to pick

Pick Qwen-Image if

  • price matters: 100 images cost $2.00, against $3.50 with Seedream 5.0 Lite
  • you want open weights you can run yourself

Pick Seedream 5.0 Lite if

  • you want the better picture: in blind votes people chose its image over Qwen-Image’s about 66% of the time
  • you mostly edit pictures: it scores higher in the editing arena (Elo 1062 against 889)

See what both make of your prompt

The specs

Spec Qwen-Image Seedream 5.0 Lite
Price per image$0.02 ($0.03 per edit)$0.035
100 images$2.00$3.50
Text-to-image Elo903 ±18 (#83 in the arena)1017 ±12 (#39 in the arena)
Editing Elo889 ±20 (#69 in the arena)1062 ±13 (#32 in the arena)
Arena votes2,3395,605
Edits uploaded picturesYesYes
Largest size——
Open weightsYesNo
Zero data retention—No
LabAlibabaByteDance
Official nameQwen-ImageSeedream 5.0 Lite
ReleasedAugust 2025February 2026

Elo ± is the 95% margin. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai.

Questions

Which is better, Qwen-Image or Seedream 5.0 Lite?

People picked Seedream 5.0 Lite’s picture over Qwen-Image’s about 66% of the time in blind votes. Qwen-Image costs 1.8× less ($0.02 against $0.035 an image), so it wins when “good enough” will do.

Which is cheaper, Qwen-Image or Seedream 5.0 Lite?

Qwen-Image: $0.02 for a 1024×1024 image, against $0.035 for Seedream 5.0 Lite. 100 images cost $2.00 and $3.50.

Can Qwen-Image and Seedream 5.0 Lite edit images?

Yes, both can change a picture you upload. In the Artificial Analysis editing arena Qwen-Image has an Elo of 889 and Seedream 5.0 Lite 1062.

How can I compare Qwen-Image and Seedream 5.0 Lite myself?

Open the comparison, type one prompt and both models draw it side by side, each with what it cost and how long it took. You sign up with Google before your first run, and new accounts start with free credit.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and see the pictures side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Qwen-Image and Seedream 5.0 Lite →

Where the numbers come from

Quality scores are Elo ratings from the Artificial Analysis image arenas, where people vote between two pictures made from the same prompt without knowing which model made which. The vote split comes from the Elo gap. Prices are for one 1024×1024 image from the Vercel AI Gateway and fal.ai; models billed per token are estimated at the quality the arena scored. The sample pictures are our own runs. Updated October 25, 2026.