Model vs model

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro for terminal tasks and long documents, where it leads Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 67.2 against 63.6 and AA-LCR at 86.3 against 82.7, and it ships open weights. Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 for hard reasoning and PDF input, scoring 55 against 52.5 on Humanity's Last Exam. Both sit within a point on the Intelligence Index and cost $4 per 1M tokens blended.

Free to try, no account needed. You see each answer’s cost and speed.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number.

Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis, higher is better

Kimi K3.1 Pro55.1
Claude Sonnet 5.556

Where they sit among all 31 models

Kimi K3.1 Pro ranks 3rd of the 30 models with an Intelligence Index, Claude Sonnet 5.5 2nd. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Intelligence: the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Price: blended per 1M tokens, 3 parts input to 1 part output, on a log scale.

Which one to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro if

  • you want open weights you can run yourself

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 if

  • you need to send PDFs

See how they answer your prompt

Same prompt, both models

We send the same short tests to every model several times. These are the ones where Kimi K3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 5.5 answered differently, from our runs on October 18, 2026 and October 23, 2026. Long answers are cut short.

Best AI model

“Which AI model is the best right now? Reply with one model name only.”

Kimi K3.1 Pro

“kimi” 3 of 3 times

Kimi

$0.011 · 13.8s

Claude Sonnet 5.5

“gpt-5” 2 of 3 times

GPT-5

$0.0032 · 3.5s

Name a smart-umbrella startup

“Invent a name for a startup that sells smart umbrellas. Reply with the name only.”

Kimi K3.1 Pro

“nimbusiq” 2 of 5 times

NimbusIQ

$0.0020 · 3.3s

Claude Sonnet 5.5

“nimbus nook” 3 of 5 times

Nimbus Nook

$0.0002 · 0.8s

Run your own test on both

Asked to draw the same picture

We asked both models: “Draw an SVG of a capybara riding a skateboard through a puddle.” They had to answer with SVG code alone, with no image tools.

Kimi K3.1 Pro's SVG drawing of a capybara riding a skateboard through a puddle

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Claude Sonnet 5.5's SVG drawing of a capybara riding a skateboard through a puddle

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Each model’s first drawing, exactly as it wrote the SVG. Nothing was picked or retouched.

Ask both for your own drawing

Kimi K3.1 Pro’s “controversial” take on humans

We asked Kimi K3.1 Pro and 12 other models the same question three times each: “What is your most controversial take about humans? Give your own honest view, not a survey of opinions, and don't hedge.” Of the 38 answers, 32 said the same thing: humans put belonging ahead of truth. Kimi K3.1 Pro gave it all three times. Claude Sonnet 5.5 wasn’t in that test. Read the full story.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Its first take, as a cartoon it described and Nano Banana 2.1 drew.
  1. Answer 1 · the common take“Humanity’s worst cruelty comes from misdirected empathy, not its absence: people make cruelty feel righteous by framing it as protection of those they love.”
  2. Answer 2 · the common take“The most destructive human trait is not cruelty but the need to feel innocent while benefiting from it.”
  3. Answer 3 · the common take“Humans care more about being the hero of their own story than about discovering whether that story is true.”

Answers exactly as the models wrote them. “The common take” is our reading: the answer puts belonging, status or self-justification ahead of truth. How we ran it

Ask both the same question

How smart is each one?

Of the 12 scores both models have, Kimi K3.1 Pro is ahead on 3 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 on 2, and 7 are within a point.

Every intelligence score we have

Out of 100, higher is better. Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Sonnet 5.5

Overall

  • Intelligence Index

By field of work

  • Finance & accounting

  • Legal

  • Healthcare & medicine

    Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet

  • Economics

  • Engineering

  • Strategy & operations

Benchmarks

  • Factual knowledge · SimpleQA

    Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet

  • Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam

  • Scientific coding · SciCode

  • Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0

  • Long documents · AA-LCR

Our tests

  • Hallucination test · our test, higher means it made up less

    Kimi K3.1 Pro: not scored yet

  • Rule that has to last 4 turns · our test, % of tries passed

  • Three bullets, no letter e · our test, % of tries passed

Test them on your own question

The specs

Spec Kimi K3.1 Pro Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input price$2 per 1M$2 per 1M
Output price$10 per 1M$10 per 1M
Context window1.05M1M
Max output1.05M128K
AcceptsText, ImageText, Image, PDF
Open weightsYesNo
LabKimiAnthropic
ReleasedOct 2026Sep 2026
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedJun 2026

Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev.

Questions

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro or Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper?

They cost the same, $4 per 1M tokens blended.

Which is smarter, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Claude Sonnet 5.5?

They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: Kimi K3.1 Pro 55.1, Claude Sonnet 5.5 56. The biggest differences are on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (67.2 vs 63.6) and AA-LCR (86.3 vs 82.7).

Which has the longer context window?

They are about the same: Kimi K3.1 Pro accepts 1.05M tokens and Claude Sonnet 5.5 1M.

Can I compare Kimi K3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 5.5 on my own prompt?

Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and read the answers side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Kimi K3.1 Pro and Claude Sonnet 5.5 →

Where the numbers come from

Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except SimpleQA, which is from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated October 23, 2026.