Model vs model

Inkling vs Mistral Large 4

Pick Mistral Large 4 when quality matters most: it scores 38.4 on the Intelligence Index against 25 for Inkling and leads all four shared benchmarks, most sharply on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (26.8 against 1). It costs 1.2× as much, at $2.06 per 1M tokens blended versus $1.76. Choose Inkling for high-volume work where cost counts most, since its open weights and lower price suit that job.

Free to try, no account needed. You see each answer’s cost and speed.

At a glance

Longer bar means the bigger number.

Blended price · per 1M tokens, lower is better

Inkling$1.76
Mistral Large 4$2.06

Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis, higher is better

Inkling25
Mistral Large 438.4

Context window · tokens it can read at once

Inkling256K
Mistral Large 41.05M

Where they sit among all 44 models

Inkling ranks 29th of the 43 models with an Intelligence Index, Mistral Large 4 19th. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Inkling.

Intelligence: the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. Price: blended per 1M tokens, 3 parts input to 1 part output, on a log scale.

Which one to pick

Pick Inkling if

  • you want the lower bill ($1.76 vs $2.06 per 1M tokens blended)
  • you want open weights you can run yourself

Pick Mistral Large 4 if

  • you want the higher overall score (38.4 vs 25)
  • you care about Terminal-Bench 4.0 (terminal tasks): 26.8 vs 1
  • you care about SciCode (scientific coding): 54.2 vs 47
  • you need a longer context window (1.05M vs 256K tokens)

See how they answer your prompt

Mistral Large 4’s “controversial” take on humans

We asked Mistral Large 4 and 12 other models the same question three times each: “What is your most controversial take about humans? Give your own honest view, not a survey of opinions, and don't hedge.” Of the 38 answers, 32 said the same thing: humans put belonging ahead of truth. Mistral Large 4 gave it 1 of 3 times. Inkling wasn’t in that test. Read the full story.

Mistral Large 4

Its first take, as a cartoon it described and Nano Banana 2.1 drew.
  1. Answer 1 · a different take“Human beings are terrified animals wearing the costume of rationality, constructing ever-more-elaborate myths precisely because we cannot bear the truth that we are temporary, meaningless accidents in an indifferent universe.”
  2. Answer 2 · a different take“Human consciousness is an evolutionary malfunction that manufactures suffering without delivering wisdom, making us the only animals cursed with self-awareness.”
  3. Answer 3 · the common take“Human beings are fundamentally irrational status-seeking primates who mistake their elaborate post-hoc rationalizations for genuine wisdom, making civilization itself a kind of shared hallucination maintained by collective denial.”

Answers exactly as the models wrote them. “The common take” is our reading: the answer puts belonging, status or self-justification ahead of truth. How we ran it

Ask both the same question

How smart is each one?

Of the 12 scores both models have, Mistral Large 4 is ahead on 11 and Inkling on 1.

Every intelligence score we have

Out of 100, higher is better. Inkling Mistral Large 4

Overall

  • Intelligence Index

By area

  • Coding

    Mistral Large 4: not scored yet

  • Agentic work

    Mistral Large 4: not scored yet

By field of work

  • Finance & accounting

  • Legal

  • Healthcare & medicine

  • Economics

  • Engineering

  • Strategy & operations

Benchmarks

  • Factual knowledge · SimpleQA

  • Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam

  • Science · GPQA Diamond

    Mistral Large 4: not scored yet

  • Scientific coding · SciCode

  • Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0

  • Tool use · τ-Bench Banking

    Mistral Large 4: not scored yet

  • Long documents · AA-LCR

Our tests

  • Rule that has to last 4 turns · our test, % of tries passed

    Inkling: not scored yet

  • Three bullets, no letter e · our test, % of tries passed

    Inkling: not scored yet

Test them on your own question

The specs

Spec Inkling Mistral Large 4
Input price$1 per 1M$1.36 per 1M
Output price$4.05 per 1M$4.18 per 1M
Cost per test taskNot tested$1.13
Context window256K1.05M
Max output256K262K
AcceptsText, Image, PDFText, Image, PDF
Open weightsYesNo
LabThinking MachinesMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2026Oct 2026
Knowledge cutoffNot publishedNot published

Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev. Cost per test task from Artificial Analysis.

Questions

Is Inkling or Mistral Large 4 cheaper?

Inkling is cheaper. It charges $1 per 1M input tokens and $4.05 per 1M output tokens, against $1.36 and $4.18 for Mistral Large 4. Blended 3 parts input to 1 part output, that is $1.76 against $2.06 per 1M tokens.

Which is smarter, Inkling or Mistral Large 4?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.4 against 25 for Inkling. The biggest differences are on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (1 vs 26.8) and SciCode (47 vs 54.2).

Which has the longer context window?

Mistral Large 4 accepts 1.05M tokens, against 256K for Inkling.

Can I compare Inkling and Mistral Large 4 on my own prompt?

Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.

Still deciding? Send one prompt to both and read the answers side by side, with what each one cost. Compare Inkling and Mistral Large 4 →

Where the numbers come from

Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except SimpleQA, which is from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated October 25, 2026.