Usage ranking
AI coding agents by usage on February 1, 2026
This ranks how much each agent is used and followed, not how good it is: a popular agent can be a worse fit for your work than a small one. Click an agent to see where its numbers come from. Each source's column shows the agent's scaled score (the leader is 100) over the raw number. 3 sources had data on this day. The score averages an agent's scaled values over the sources that can measure it (at least three).
1
Claude CodeAnthropic · closed sourceUsage score 501007.5M4763k42.7M- npm 100 · 7.5M
- GitHub 47 · 63k
- VS Code 4 · 2.7M
- npm: 1007,539,823 downloads of @anthropic-ai/claude-code in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. That's the most of any agent in this source, so it scores 100. Source
- GitHub: 4763,236 stars on github.com/anthropics/claude-code on Feb 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Claude Code scores 63k ÷ 135k × 100 = 47. Source
- VS Code: 42,655,617 installs of the anthropic.claude-code extension on Jan 5, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Claude Code scores 2.7M ÷ 59M × 100 = 4. Source
Usage score: (100 + 47 + 4) ÷ 3 = 50. Claude Code website
2
OpenClawOpenClaw · open sourceUsage score 356416k100135k–- npm 6 · 416k
- GitHub 100 · 135k
- npm: 6416,067 downloads of openclaw in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so OpenClaw scores 416k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 6. Source
- GitHub: 100135,113 stars on github.com/openclaw/openclaw on Feb 1, 2026. That's the most of any agent in this source, so it scores 100. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (6 + 100) ÷ 3 = 35, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. OpenClaw website
3
GitHub CopilotGitHub · closed sourceUsage score 342155k–10059M- npm 2 · 155k
- VS Code 100 · 59M
- npm: 2155,084 downloads of @github/copilot in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so GitHub Copilot scores 155k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 2. Source
- VS Code: 10059,257,804 installs of the GitHub.copilot-chat extension on Feb 2, 2026. That's the most of any agent in this source, so it scores 100. Source
Not counted: GitHub, because it has no public GitHub repo.
Usage score: (2 + 100) ÷ 3 = 34, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. GitHub Copilot website
4
Gemini CLIGoogle · open sourceUsage score 267546k6993k1392k- npm 7 · 546k
- GitHub 69 · 93k
- VS Code 1 · 392k
- npm: 7546,431 downloads of @google/gemini-cli in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Gemini CLI scores 546k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 7. Source
- GitHub: 6993,254 stars on github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli on Feb 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Gemini CLI scores 93k ÷ 135k × 100 = 69. Source
- VS Code: 1392,333 installs of the Google.gemini-cli-vscode-ide-companion extension on Dec 12, 2025. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Gemini CLI scores 392k ÷ 59M × 100 = 1. Source
Usage score: (7 + 69 + 1) ÷ 3 = 26. Gemini CLI website
5
OpenCodeAnomaly · open sourceUsage score 255349k7094k–- npm 5 · 349k
- GitHub 70 · 94k
- npm: 5349,156 downloads of opencode-ai in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so OpenCode scores 349k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 5. Source
- GitHub: 7094,012 stars on github.com/anomalyco/opencode on Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so OpenCode scores 94k ÷ 135k × 100 = 70. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because there's no snapshot of its extension page from around that day.
Usage score: (5 + 70) ÷ 3 = 25, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. OpenCode website
6
Codex CLIOpenAI · open sourceUsage score 198618k4358k63.5M- npm 8 · 618k
- GitHub 43 · 58k
- VS Code 6 · 3.5M
- npm: 8618,412 downloads of @openai/codex in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Codex CLI scores 618k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 8. Source
- GitHub: 4358,418 stars on github.com/openai/codex on Feb 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Codex CLI scores 58k ÷ 135k × 100 = 43. Source
- VS Code: 63,531,141 installs of the openai.chatgpt extension on Feb 2, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Codex CLI scores 3.5M ÷ 59M × 100 = 6. Source
Usage score: (8 + 43 + 6) ÷ 3 = 19. Codex CLI website
7
ClineCline · open sourceUsage score 162122k4257k52.9M- npm 2 · 122k
- GitHub 42 · 57k
- VS Code 5 · 2.9M
- npm: 2122,315 downloads of cline in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Cline scores 122k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 2. Source
- GitHub: 4256,576 stars on github.com/cline/cline on Jan 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Cline scores 57k ÷ 135k × 100 = 42. Source
- VS Code: 52,949,712 installs of the saoudrizwan.claude-dev extension on Jan 24, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Cline scores 2.9M ÷ 59M × 100 = 5. Source
Usage score: (2 + 42 + 5) ÷ 3 = 16. Cline website
8
Roo CodeRoo Code · open sourceUsage score 6–1622k21.1M- GitHub 16 · 22k
- VS Code 2 · 1.1M
- GitHub: 1621,540 stars on github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code on Jan 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Roo Code scores 22k ÷ 135k × 100 = 16. Source
- VS Code: 21,146,390 installs of the RooVeterinaryInc.roo-cline extension on Jan 12, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Roo Code scores 1.1M ÷ 59M × 100 = 2. Source
Not counted: npm, because it has no command-line package on npm.
Usage score: (16 + 2) ÷ 3 = 6, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Roo Code website
9
Qwen CodeAlibaba · open sourceUsage score 4143k1317k–- npm 1 · 43k
- GitHub 13 · 17k
- npm: 143,083 downloads of @qwen-code/qwen-code in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Qwen Code scores 43k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 1. Source
- GitHub: 1317,172 stars on github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code on Jan 9, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Qwen Code scores 17k ÷ 135k × 100 = 13. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (1 + 13) ÷ 3 = 4, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Qwen Code website
10
CrushCharm · open sourceUsage score 402.6k1217k–- npm 0 · 2.6k
- GitHub 12 · 17k
- npm: 02,568 downloads of @charmland/crush in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Crush scores 2.6k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 1216,570 stars on github.com/charmbracelet/crush on Jan 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Crush scores 17k ÷ 135k × 100 = 12. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (0 + 12) ÷ 3 = 4, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Crush website
11
Kilo CodeKilo · open sourceUsage score 409.9k1014k1607k- npm 0 · 9.9k
- GitHub 10 · 14k
- VS Code 1 · 607k
- npm: 09,910 downloads of @kilocode/cli in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Kilo Code scores 9.9k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 1013,662 stars on github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode on Jan 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Kilo Code scores 14k ÷ 135k × 100 = 10. Source
- VS Code: 1606,712 installs of the kilocode.Kilo-Code extension on Jan 6, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Kilo Code scores 607k ÷ 59M × 100 = 1. Source
Usage score: (0 + 10 + 1) ÷ 3 = 4. Kilo Code website
12
piMario Zechner · open sourceUsage score 107.6k34.5k–- npm 0 · 7.6k
- GitHub 3 · 4.5k
- npm: 07,588 downloads of @mariozechner/pi-coding-agent in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so pi scores 7.6k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 34,478 stars on github.com/badlogic/pi-mono on Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so pi scores 4.5k ÷ 135k × 100 = 3. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (0 + 3) ÷ 3 = 1, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. pi website
13
AuggieAugment Code · closed sourceUsage score 0023k–1680k- npm 0 · 23k
- VS Code 1 · 680k
- npm: 023,236 downloads of @augmentcode/auggie in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Auggie scores 23k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 0. Source
- VS Code: 1680,079 installs of the augment.vscode-augment extension on Jan 13, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Auggie scores 680k ÷ 59M × 100 = 1. Source
Not counted: GitHub, because it has no public GitHub repo.
Usage score: (0 + 1) ÷ 3 = 0, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Auggie website
14
Letta CodeLetta · open sourceUsage score 005k1832–- npm 0 · 5k
- GitHub 1 · 832
- npm: 05,018 downloads of @letta-ai/letta-code in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Letta Code scores 5k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 1832 stars on github.com/letta-ai/letta-code on Jan 11, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 135k, so Letta Code scores 832 ÷ 135k × 100 = 1. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (0 + 1) ÷ 3 = 0, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Letta Code website
15
AmpSourcegraph · closed sourceUsage score 0034k–087k- npm 0 · 34k
- VS Code 0 · 87k
- npm: 034,104 downloads of @sourcegraph/amp in the 7 days to Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 7.5M, so Amp scores 34k ÷ 7.5M × 100 = 0. Source
- VS Code: 086,674 installs of the sourcegraph.amp extension on Jan 17, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Amp scores 87k ÷ 59M × 100 = 0. Source
Not counted: GitHub, because it has no public GitHub repo.
Usage score: (0 + 0) ÷ 3 = 0, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Amp website
Not ranked that day, only one source has them: OpenHands (GitHub, 67k), Aider (GitHub, 40k), Droid (npm, 910).
Method
How the usage score is made
No single public number measures how much each AI coding agent is used, so we blend the ones that exist. In each source the leader scores 100 and the rest are scaled to it. An agent's score is the average over the sources that can measure it. Sources that can't see an agent at all (Cursor has no npm package) are left out of its average, but the average always counts at least three sources, so an agent seen by only one or two can't outrank one that leads everywhere. An agent needs two sources to be ranked.
- npmCLI downloads, 7 days · data from Feb 1, 2026
Downloads of each agent's command-line package in the 7 days to the date, with one-off bursts (mirrors, bots) capped. Downloads count installs and CI runs, not people, and agents with their own installer are undercounted. Source
- GitHubStars · data from Feb 2, 2026
Stars on the agent's GitHub repo, from monthly snapshots. Stars measure interest, and build up over time. Source
- VS CodeExtension installs, all time · data from Feb 2, 2026
All-time installs of the agent's VS Code extension, from monthly snapshots. Cursor and Windsurf install from Open VSX instead, which isn't counted. Source
Browse
The most used AI coding agent, month by month
Pick the model behind your agent
Most of these agents let you choose the model. Send one prompt to up to six models and see which answer you'd actually use, with what each one cost.
Data through October 21, 2026 for 20 agents. npm downloads from the npm registry; OpenRouter app rankings from OpenRouter (CC BY 4.0); GitHub stars and VS Code installs from monthly snapshots in the Internet Archive and the live APIs; survey figures as published by Stack Overflow and JetBrains.