Usage ranking
AI coding agents by usage on March 1, 2026
This ranks how much each agent is used and followed, not how good it is: a popular agent can be a worse fit for your work than a small one. Click an agent to see where its numbers come from. Each source's column shows the agent's scaled score (the leader is 100) over the raw number. 3 sources had data on this day. The score averages an agent's scaled values over the sources that can measure it (at least three).
1
Claude CodeAnthropic · closed sourceUsage score 461009.3M3072k95.4M- npm 100 · 9.3M
- GitHub 30 · 72k
- VS Code 9 · 5.4M
- npm: 1009,342,431 downloads of @anthropic-ai/claude-code in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. That's the most of any agent in this source, so it scores 100. Source
- GitHub: 3071,847 stars on github.com/anthropics/claude-code on Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Claude Code scores 72k ÷ 241k × 100 = 30. Source
- VS Code: 95,362,769 installs of the anthropic.claude-code extension on Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Claude Code scores 5.4M ÷ 59M × 100 = 9. Source
Usage score: (100 + 30 + 9) ÷ 3 = 46. Claude Code website
2
OpenClawOpenClaw · open sourceUsage score 39161.5M100241k–- npm 16 · 1.5M
- GitHub 100 · 241k
- npm: 161,479,089 downloads of openclaw in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so OpenClaw scores 1.5M ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 16. Source
- GitHub: 100240,811 stars on github.com/openclaw/openclaw on Mar 1, 2026. That's the most of any agent in this source, so it scores 100. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (16 + 100) ÷ 3 = 39, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. OpenClaw website
3
GitHub CopilotGitHub · closed sourceUsage score 342188k–10059M- npm 2 · 188k
- VS Code 100 · 59M
- npm: 2187,858 downloads of @github/copilot in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so GitHub Copilot scores 188k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 2. Source
- VS Code: 10059,257,804 installs of the GitHub.copilot-chat extension on Feb 2, 2026. That's the most of any agent in this source, so it scores 100. Source
Not counted: GitHub, because it has no public GitHub repo.
Usage score: (2 + 100) ÷ 3 = 34, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. GitHub Copilot website
4
Codex CLIOpenAI · open sourceUsage score 19232.1M2662k85M- npm 23 · 2.1M
- GitHub 26 · 62k
- VS Code 8 · 5M
- npm: 232,140,172 downloads of @openai/codex in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Codex CLI scores 2.1M ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 23. Source
- GitHub: 2662,454 stars on github.com/openai/codex on Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Codex CLI scores 62k ÷ 241k × 100 = 26. Source
- VS Code: 85,036,019 installs of the openai.chatgpt extension on Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Codex CLI scores 5M ÷ 59M × 100 = 8. Source
Usage score: (23 + 26 + 8) ÷ 3 = 19. Codex CLI website
5
Gemini CLIGoogle · open sourceUsage score 168759k4096k1584k- npm 8 · 759k
- GitHub 40 · 96k
- VS Code 1 · 584k
- npm: 8758,678 downloads of @google/gemini-cli in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Gemini CLI scores 759k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 8. Source
- GitHub: 4096,161 stars on github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli on Mar 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Gemini CLI scores 96k ÷ 241k × 100 = 40. Source
- VS Code: 1583,958 installs of the Google.gemini-cli-vscode-ide-companion extension on Feb 17, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Gemini CLI scores 584k ÷ 59M × 100 = 1. Source
Usage score: (8 + 40 + 1) ÷ 3 = 16. Gemini CLI website
6
OpenCodeAnomaly · open sourceUsage score 155473k3994k–- npm 5 · 473k
- GitHub 39 · 94k
- npm: 5473,386 downloads of opencode-ai in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so OpenCode scores 473k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 5. Source
- GitHub: 3994,012 stars on github.com/anomalyco/opencode on Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so OpenCode scores 94k ÷ 241k × 100 = 39. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because there's no snapshot of its extension page from around that day.
Usage score: (5 + 39) ÷ 3 = 15, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. OpenCode website
7
ClineCline · open sourceUsage score 101139k2458k53.1M- npm 1 · 139k
- GitHub 24 · 58k
- VS Code 5 · 3.1M
- npm: 1139,208 downloads of cline in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Cline scores 139k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 1. Source
- GitHub: 2457,537 stars on github.com/cline/cline on Feb 3, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Cline scores 58k ÷ 241k × 100 = 24. Source
- VS Code: 53,058,125 installs of the saoudrizwan.claude-dev extension on Feb 9, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Cline scores 3.1M ÷ 59M × 100 = 5. Source
Usage score: (1 + 24 + 5) ÷ 3 = 10. Cline website
8
Roo CodeRoo Code · open sourceUsage score 4–922k21.2M- GitHub 9 · 22k
- VS Code 2 · 1.2M
- GitHub: 922,086 stars on github.com/RooCodeInc/Roo-Code on Feb 3, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Roo Code scores 22k ÷ 241k × 100 = 9. Source
- VS Code: 21,238,301 installs of the RooVeterinaryInc.roo-cline extension on Feb 9, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Roo Code scores 1.2M ÷ 59M × 100 = 2. Source
Not counted: npm, because it has no command-line package on npm.
Usage score: (9 + 2) ÷ 3 = 4, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Roo Code website
9
Qwen CodeAlibaba · open sourceUsage score 3158k820k–- npm 1 · 58k
- GitHub 8 · 20k
- npm: 158,417 downloads of @qwen-code/qwen-code in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Qwen Code scores 58k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 1. Source
- GitHub: 819,738 stars on github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code on Mar 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Qwen Code scores 20k ÷ 241k × 100 = 8. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (1 + 8) ÷ 3 = 3, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Qwen Code website
10
CrushCharm · open sourceUsage score 303.4k921k–- npm 0 · 3.4k
- GitHub 9 · 21k
- npm: 03,420 downloads of @charmland/crush in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Crush scores 3.4k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 920,724 stars on github.com/charmbracelet/crush on Mar 2, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Crush scores 21k ÷ 241k × 100 = 9. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (0 + 9) ÷ 3 = 3, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Crush website
11
Kilo CodeKilo · open sourceUsage score 3031k716k1710k- npm 0 · 31k
- GitHub 7 · 16k
- VS Code 1 · 710k
- npm: 030,720 downloads of @kilocode/cli in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Kilo Code scores 31k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 716,057 stars on github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode on Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Kilo Code scores 16k ÷ 241k × 100 = 7. Source
- VS Code: 1710,118 installs of the kilocode.Kilo-Code extension on Feb 8, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Kilo Code scores 710k ÷ 59M × 100 = 1. Source
Usage score: (0 + 7 + 1) ÷ 3 = 3. Kilo Code website
12
piMario Zechner · open sourceUsage score 107.6k24.5k–- npm 0 · 7.6k
- GitHub 2 · 4.5k
- npm: 07,588 downloads of @mariozechner/pi-coding-agent in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so pi scores 7.6k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 24,478 stars on github.com/badlogic/pi-mono on Feb 1, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so pi scores 4.5k ÷ 241k × 100 = 2. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (0 + 2) ÷ 3 = 1, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. pi website
13
AuggieAugment Code · closed sourceUsage score 1037k–1700k- npm 0 · 37k
- VS Code 1 · 700k
- npm: 036,773 downloads of @augmentcode/auggie in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Auggie scores 37k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 0. Source
- VS Code: 1699,841 installs of the augment.vscode-augment extension on Feb 9, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Auggie scores 700k ÷ 59M × 100 = 1. Source
Not counted: GitHub, because it has no public GitHub repo.
Usage score: (0 + 1) ÷ 3 = 1, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Auggie website
14
AmpSourcegraph · closed sourceUsage score 0036k–099k- npm 0 · 36k
- VS Code 0 · 99k
- npm: 035,613 downloads of @sourcegraph/amp in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Amp scores 36k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 0. Source
- VS Code: 098,538 installs of the sourcegraph.amp extension on Feb 19, 2026. The leader here is GitHub Copilot with 59M, so Amp scores 99k ÷ 59M × 100 = 0. Source
Not counted: GitHub, because it has no public GitHub repo.
Usage score: (0 + 0) ÷ 3 = 0, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Amp website
15
Letta CodeLetta · open sourceUsage score 004.7k01k–- npm 0 · 4.7k
- GitHub 0 · 1k
- npm: 04,672 downloads of @letta-ai/letta-code in the 7 days to Mar 1, 2026. The leader here is Claude Code with 9.3M, so Letta Code scores 4.7k ÷ 9.3M × 100 = 0. Source
- GitHub: 01,024 stars on github.com/letta-ai/letta-code on Feb 12, 2026. The leader here is OpenClaw with 241k, so Letta Code scores 1k ÷ 241k × 100 = 0. Source
Not counted: VS Code, because it has no VS Code extension.
Usage score: (0 + 0) ÷ 3 = 0, divided by 3 rather than 2 because every agent's average counts at least 3 sources. Letta Code website
Not ranked that day, only one source has them: OpenHands (GitHub, 67k), Aider (GitHub, 41k), Hermes Agent (GitHub, 137), Droid (npm, 829).
Method
How the usage score is made
No single public number measures how much each AI coding agent is used, so we blend the ones that exist. In each source the leader scores 100 and the rest are scaled to it. An agent's score is the average over the sources that can measure it. Sources that can't see an agent at all (Cursor has no npm package) are left out of its average, but the average always counts at least three sources, so an agent seen by only one or two can't outrank one that leads everywhere. An agent needs two sources to be ranked.
- npmCLI downloads, 7 days · data from Mar 1, 2026
Downloads of each agent's command-line package in the 7 days to the date, with one-off bursts (mirrors, bots) capped. Downloads count installs and CI runs, not people, and agents with their own installer are undercounted. Source
- GitHubStars · data from Mar 2, 2026
Stars on the agent's GitHub repo, from monthly snapshots. Stars measure interest, and build up over time. Source
- VS CodeExtension installs, all time · data from Mar 1, 2026
All-time installs of the agent's VS Code extension, from monthly snapshots. Cursor and Windsurf install from Open VSX instead, which isn't counted. Source
Browse
The most used AI coding agent, month by month
Pick the model behind your agent
Most of these agents let you choose the model. Send one prompt to up to six models and see which answer you'd actually use, with what each one cost.
Data through October 21, 2026 for 20 agents. npm downloads from the npm registry; OpenRouter app rankings from OpenRouter (CC BY 4.0); GitHub stars and VS Code installs from monthly snapshots in the Internet Archive and the live APIs; survey figures as published by Stack Overflow and JetBrains.