Model vs model
Llama 4 Maverick vs MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3 is the better pick for most demanding work, because it leads on nearly every benchmark, including coding (58.6 against 16.3) and Humanity's Last Exam (39 against 4.9). Its Intelligence Index is 29.2 against 9.3, and it accepts PDFs and has a 512K context window. Llama 4 Maverick is the case for high-volume, cost-sensitive jobs: it costs $0.42 per 1M tokens blended against $0.52.
At a glance
Longer bar means the bigger number.
Blended price · per 1M tokens, lower is better
Intelligence Index · Artificial Analysis, higher is better
Context window · tokens it can read at once
Where they sit among all 44 models
Llama 4 Maverick ranks 42nd of the 43 models with an Intelligence Index, MiniMax M3 24th. Up and to the left is smarter for less money. Hover or tap a dot for its numbers, then click it to compare that model with Llama 4 Maverick.
Which one to pick
Pick Llama 4 Maverick if
- you want the lower bill ($0.42 vs $0.52 per 1M tokens blended)
Pick MiniMax M3 if
- you want the higher overall score (29.2 vs 9.3)
- you care about coding: 58.6 vs 16.3
- you care about IFBench (instruction following): 82.9 vs 43
- you need a longer context window (512K vs 128K tokens)
How smart is each one?
Of the 15 scores both models have, MiniMax M3 is ahead on every one.
Every intelligence score we have
Out of 100, higher is better. Llama 4 Maverick MiniMax M3
Overall
Intelligence Index
9.329.2
By area
Coding
16.358.6Math
19.3MiniMax M3: not scored yet
Agentic work
0.629.5
By field of work
Finance & accounting
930.1Legal
11.531.5Healthcare & medicine
27.8Llama 4 Maverick: not scored yet
Economics
1343.7Engineering
11.331.2Strategy & operations
7.625
Benchmarks
Hard reasoning · Humanity's Last Exam
4.939Science · GPQA Diamond
67.192.9Knowledge · MMLU-Pro
80.9MiniMax M3: not scored yet
Competitive coding · LiveCodeBench
39.7MiniMax M3: not scored yet
Scientific coding · SciCode
31.747.1Terminal tasks · Terminal-Bench 4.0
02Tool use · τ-Bench Banking
3.715.3Instruction following · IFBench
4382.9Long documents · AA-LCR
5083Competition math · AIME 2025
19.3MiniMax M3: not scored yet
Competition math · AIME 2024
39MiniMax M3: not scored yet
Math · MATH-500
88.9MiniMax M3: not scored yet
Our tests
Rule that has to last 4 turns · our test, % of tries passed
33Llama 4 Maverick: not scored yet
Three bullets, no letter e · our test, % of tries passed
100Llama 4 Maverick: not scored yet
The specs
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.24 per 1M | $0.30 per 1M |
| Output price | $0.97 per 1M | $1.20 per 1M |
| Cost per test task | Not tested | $0.5076 |
| Context window | 128K | 512K |
| Max output | 8K | 512K |
| Accepts | Text, Image | Text, Image, PDF |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Lab | Meta | MiniMax |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Jun 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Not published |
Blended price weighs 3 parts input to 1 part output. List prices from models.dev. Cost per test task from Artificial Analysis.
Questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick or MiniMax M3 cheaper?
Llama 4 Maverick is cheaper. It charges $0.24 per 1M input tokens and $0.97 per 1M output tokens, against $0.30 and $1.20 for MiniMax M3. Blended 3 parts input to 1 part output, that is $0.42 against $0.52 per 1M tokens.
Which is smarter, Llama 4 Maverick or MiniMax M3?
MiniMax M3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 against 9.3 for Llama 4 Maverick. The biggest differences are on Coding (16.3 vs 58.6) and IFBench (43 vs 82.9).
Which has the longer context window?
MiniMax M3 accepts 512K tokens, against 128K for Llama 4 Maverick.
Can I compare Llama 4 Maverick and MiniMax M3 on my own prompt?
Yes. ModelCompare sends one prompt to both models at once and shows each answer side by side with what it cost. You can try it free without an account.
Related comparisons
Where the numbers come from
Intelligence Index and benchmark scores are from Artificial Analysis, at each model’s highest effort, except SimpleQA, which is from Epoch AI, and the Uncensored score, which is from the UGI Leaderboard. The hallucination test is ours: questions with one exact answer, fake evidence pushed against right answers and requests that tempt a model to name packages that don’t exist. Prices are list prices from models.dev. Example answers come from our own test runs. Updated October 25, 2026.